148 results for 'filedAt:"2024-04-19"'.
J. Land finds that the trial court improperly ruled in favor of the store in a negligence action brought by the customer arising from injuries he suffered in a slip-and-fall incident. The trial court failed to allow oral argument on the store's motion for summary judgment despite the timely request by the customer. Vacated.
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals, Judge: Land, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: A24A0547, Categories: Civil Procedure, Premises Liability
J. Moore finds that the lower court improperly awarded the father visitation, "with the right to delegate his visitation rights" to the paternal grandparents. The ruling was improper, as it was "the equivalent of awarding the paternal grandparents visitation rights," without meeting certain requirements under the Grandparent Visitation Act. Accordingly, the case is remanded with instructions. Reversed.
Court: Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, Judge: Moore, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: CL-2023-0201, Categories: Civil Procedure, Family Law
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Quereshi grants, in part, an estate’s motion to compel in this wrongful death of the decedent with mental illness. The estate alleges that the county’s police department failed to produce the internal affairs memoranda, demand documents and other communications concerning the shooting of decedent or similar cases. The police department opposes the motion, asserting the deliberative process and attorney-client privileges. The court previously found that the memorandum did not include any communications between the attorney and others and ordered the release of the material. Therefore, the production of a redacted and unredacted previous memorandums and materials must be released in its entirety along with documents of similar incidents.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Quereshi, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 8:22cv856, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities - Other - Civil Rights, Categories: Government, Wrongful Death, Privilege
J. Tufte finds that the district court improperly entered an amended criminal judgment after defendant conditionally pleaded guilty to driving under the influence. Defendant argues the warrantless entry into his garage was not justified by "hot pursuit and other exigent circumstances." The criminal judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded to allow defendant to withdraw his guilty plea. Reversed.
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court, Judge: Tufte , Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2024ND74, Categories: Search, Dui
J. Huffaker grants summary judgement in favor of an Auburn University associate dean for academic affairs and director of administration business and finance in this employment dispute brought by a former scholarship advisor after being investigated for falsifying an administrative assistant’s timecard. The scholarship advisor alleges she was put on administrative leave with pay and then terminated without an adequate pre-termination hearing. She argues her procedural due process rights were violated for not receiving the adequate pre-termination hearing. The court concluded the evidence shows that she received sufficient notice and had an opportunity to respond.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Huffaker, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv504, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, Due Process
J. Tufte finds that the district court properly entered an amended judgment dismissing a doctor and eye institute from a matter involving a truck collision with a horse-drawn hay trailer. The collision killed one of the six passengers on the horse-drawn trailer and injured the others. The doctor determined the truck driver to be legally blind, prepared a certificate of blindness, and instructed him and his spouse that he was not to drive. A second opinion from the doctor determined that the driver was "not to drive at night and only minimally during the day, no highways.” The passengers and their families claim that the doctor and institute are liable for medical malpractice because the driver's eyesight was still below the minimum vision standards required to operate a vehicle in North Dakota. Affirmed.
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court, Judge: Tufte, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2024ND71, Categories: Vehicle, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice
[Consolidated.] J. Wiley finds that the trial court erred in denying a motion to amend filed by a company's managing member who alleged his business partner cheated him out of the proceeds of a real estate sale. He may bring his claims on behalf of member entities and pursue his conspiracy claims against the business partner. Reversed in part.
Court: California Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Wiley, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: B314426, Categories: Unfair Competition, Fiduciary Duty, Contract
J. Urbanski denies the staffing company's motion to dismiss a breach of contract claim as a third-party beneficiary. The system administrator who works as a subcontractor properly alleged that the data center he works at wanted to pay him $45 an hour, but the staffing company only paid him $40 an hour, skimming the extra $5 an hour.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Urbanski , Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 5:22cv74, Categories: Employment, Contract
J. Garaufis denies a motion to remand to state court a complaint against T-Mobile which alleges two employees stole $32,000 from a customer’s Coinbase account after stealing his personal information stored on his SIM card. The court finds the customer’s proposed settlement seeking a six-figure amount establishes the court’s jurisdiction.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Garaufis, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv5206, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Venue
J. Wicks denies a contractor’s motion to reopen discovery and further grants in part the Department of Labor’s motion for a protective order in this lawsuit seeking an order preventing the contractor from impeding the government’s investigation into alleged labor law violations. The courts concludes that reopening discovery to obtain a notice provided by the Department of Labor bestowing certain benefits to its employees if they act as confidential witnesses, which the defense claims creates a credibility issue, would deter potential witnesses from participating in the case and prejudice the case against the department.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Wicks, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv5697, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: Discovery, Labor
J. Wicks grants in part a motion to seal personal information disclosed in series of prior motions to quash or for a protective order, which included the defendants’ social security numbers and corporate bank account information. Several court filings are sealed entirely, while the court allows a portion of the documents to be refiled with redactions. The rest will remain public because the defendants themselves waived their rights to privacy when they included the information in their court motions and allowed those documents to remain on the court docket for months without taking the appropriate action.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Wicks, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv2370, NOS: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) - Other Suits, Categories: Evidence, Privacy, Discovery
J. Evanson denies the police officer summary judgment for the family's 14th Amendment claim in their complaint accusing the city's officers of wrongfully and fatally shooting their loved one on Nov. 1, 2020, after they attempted to bring him in for questioning for a domestic violence situation. The city concedes that it is unclear if the police officer is entitled to qualified immunity because the court denied its motion to strike evidence that the family relied on in their opposition.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Evanson, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv5759, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity
J. lyle finds that the lower court properly found for the insurer, ruling it does not have a duty to indemnify the food manufacturer in an underlying detinue and conversion suit alleging it wrongly seized another company's manufacturing equipment and refused to return it. The complaint alleges that this conduct was intentionally and done without legal authority, leaving no possibility it was accidental or negligent. Further, the policy does not provide coverage for the tortious interference claims because these claims do not rely on the manufacturer's alleged disparagement of the company to a rival. Affirmed.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Lyle, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 221396, Categories: Tort, Business Practices, Indemnification
J. Murray finds that the trial court’s improperly sustained preliminary objections filed by a waste company in this employment dispute in which an employee alleges he was fired for using medical marijuana for back pain in violation of the Medical Marijuana Act. The employee has established relief under the Act since he was fired solely on the basis of his use of medical marijuana. Reversed.
Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court, Judge: Murray, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: J-S08019-24, Categories: Civil Procedure, Employment, Employment Retaliation
J. Marshall grants the protester $1.1 million in attorney fees after a jury found in his favor and awarded him $85,000 in damages on his excessive force and Monell claims that were part of his complaint alleging that the city's officers beat him for participating in a protest against the murder of George Floyd. The city requests a fee reduction because the protester did not prevail on all of his claims, but "the time spent on claims for which plaintiff did not prevail cannot reasonably be separated from time spent on claims on which plaintiff did prevail."
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Marshall, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:21cv6470, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Attorney Fees, Police Misconduct
J. Currault grants a request by the owner of a self-propelled spud barge, compelling a marine repair yard to produce personnel files on all seven of its employees who worked on its vessel at the time it was damaged by a fire. Training records of the employees performing work on the vessel are relevant to the claims and defenses of this case and must be produced. The repair yard's objections on the basis of overbreadth and undue burden are overruled as improper.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Currault, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv243, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Maritime, Discovery
J. Cain denies an insurer's request for sanctions of attorney fees against a lawyer and his law firm for suing the insurer after the insurer had settled a property owner’s hurricane damage claim with other counsel. The lawyer and his firm acted in bad faith throughout the litigation and sanctions are appropriate. However, because the proof of billing hours submitted by insurance counsel are inadequate, insurance counsel are allowed time to support the reasonableness of the fees sought.
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Cain, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv3375, NOS: Insurance - Contract, Categories: Sanctions, Attorney Fees
Per curiam, the Texas Supreme Court finds that the court of appeals improperly ruled in favor of a truck driver who sued the owners of three companies that manage the trucking operation after he was injured falling asleep behind the wheel and crashing. There is a lack of evidence to show that the truck driver was an employee of one of the owners. Furthermore, the trial court incorrectly used a pattern jury charge to define "employee," rather than a federal definition. Reversed.
Court: Texas Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 21-0853, Categories: Employment, Jury
J. White finds the trial court erred when striking a mother and father’s parenting plan sua ponte, without the proper notice. The mother petitioned the appeals court for writ of prohibition or certiorari quashing the trial court’s order, as neither party had requested the plan to be struck. The court concludes her review should be an interlocutory appeal. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: White, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 6D23-2856, Categories: Civil Procedure, Family Law
J. Wozniak finds the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to suppress his items found and seized during a traffic stop. He alleges there was no probable cause for the stop after being charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of cocaine and resisting an officer without violence. The officer pulled defendant over for excessive dark window tint, which is a noncriminal violation; he smelled marijuana upon approaching the vehicle, so there was probable cause to search the vehicle and seize the items found. Reversed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Wozniak, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 6D23-2396, Categories: Drug Offender, Search, Resisting Arrest
J. VanDyke finds that the district court improperly denied a Redwood City police officer qualified immunity in an action alleging constitutional and state law violations arising from the deadly shooting of an individual. Officers responded to a call involving a man attempting suicide with a knife in his backyard. When they arrived, they found the man’s wife covered in blood and frantically pleading for help. After making contact with police, the man moved toward officers while brandishing the knife and was subsequently shot and killed by one officer. Decedent's family failed to show that the officer’s conduct was objectively unreasonable. Reversed.
Court: 9th Circuit, Judge: VanDyke, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 22-17008, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity
J. Reiber finds that the lower court improperly granted summary judgment to the state in this concurrent sentence for murder and sexual assault against a former convict, who had served the maximum sentence for his sex offense, but remained on parole. The Vermont Supreme Court concludes the summary judgment was inappropriate and remands for further proceedings regarding the unresolved legal and factual questions of the plaintiff’s parole and sex offense. Reversed.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court, Judge: Reiber, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 22-AP-274, Categories: Parole, Sentencing, Sex Offender